Sports Science Physiotherapy Centre

Sports Science Physiotherapy Centre Well recognized physiotherapy practice at the world-renowned Sports Science Institute of South Africa.

It is staffed by experienced physiotherapists with a long history of active involvement in a variety of professional and amateur South African sport. Our Services include but are not limited to the following:
- Physiotherapy
- Sports Physiotherapy
- Exercise Rehabilitation
- Orthopaedic Rehabilitation
- Therapeutic Exercise Program
- Prescriptions

22/04/2026

It's been amazing working with the zip zap circus performers. Rewarding and fun!

08/11/2025

How fast can tendons actually get stronger?⁠

Faster than you think — research shows measurable changes in just 6 weeks!⁠

Early gains come from improved material quality (collagen organization & stiffness).⁠

Structural growth (cross-sectional area) takes longer — months, not weeks.⁠

The key? High strain, slow tempo, and consistency⁠

Learn the full science behind tendon adaptation — watch the lecture ‘Tendinopathy adaptation principles and new clinical framework' by Peter Malliaras on Trust me-Ed!

04/11/2025
An absolute pleasure looking after these performers. Well worth the ticket price and good fun for the whole family.
04/11/2025

An absolute pleasure looking after these performers. Well worth the ticket price and good fun for the whole family.

19/10/2025

❣️ Love transcends...

Step into the ethereal world of Giselle... where innocence, passion, and forgiveness dance in harmony.

Experience ballet at its most exquisite with Cape Ballet Africa’s breathtaking new production, choreographed by the legendary Maina Gielgud, featuring sumptuous designs by Michael Mitchell and performances to recordings by the Cape Town Philharmonic Orchestra.

📆 13 - 22 November
📍 The Baxter
🎟 Book now at Webtickets: https://www.webtickets.co.za/v2/event.aspx?itemid=1570363807

Running season has started, so runners have a read!
11/10/2025

Running season has started, so runners have a read!

29/09/2025
25/08/2025
Just in from the British Journal of Sports Medicine
20/07/2025

Just in from the British Journal of Sports Medicine

Interesting read and re-think
03/07/2025

Interesting read and re-think

Just published 🔥

Is Lifting Technique🏋️‍♀️ Related to Pain and Functional Limitation? A Replicated Single-Case Design Study of Five People With Lifting-Related Chronic Low Back Pain

👉 Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability and is frequently exacerbated by lifting tasks (Stevens et al., 2016). Conventional clinical and occupational ergonomics guidelines advocate for squat-like lifting as the “safe” standard, emphasizing minimal lumbar flexion through increased knee flexion (Caneiro et al., 2018; Nolan et al., 2018; von Arx et al., 2021). However, empirical evidence supporting this approach is weak (Martimo et al., 2008; Verbeek et al., 2012). Cross-sectional studies have even shown that individuals with CLBP tend to use more rigid, squat-dominant techniques than those without back pain, potentially reinforcing maladaptive motor control strategies (Nolan et al., 2020; Saraceni et al., 2022).

👉 Recent literature has emphasized the need for individual-level analysis in CLBP to capture the heterogeneity in presentation and response to intervention (Wernli et al., 2020; Christe et al., 2024). Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT), a multidimensional behavioral intervention, has shown promise in improving function and reducing pain in CLBP (O’Sullivan et al., 2018; Kent et al., 2023). However, the relationship between movement change and symptom relief in lifting-specific contexts remains underexplored.

📘 A brand-new study by Au and colleagues aimed to fill that gap using a replicated single-case design (SCD) to examine within-person associations between changes in lifting kinematics and clinical outcomes. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40596778/)

🧍‍♂️Methods

Five individuals with lifting-related CLBP participated in a replicated SCD with baseline (4–6 weeks), intervention (12 weeks), and follow-up (3 months) phases. Kinematic data were collected weekly using wearable inertial sensors (Noraxon myoMOTION) during a 20-repetition lifting task. Pain (NRS) and lifting-specific functional limitation (PSFS) were collected concurrently. The intervention consisted of up to 10 CFT sessions per participant. Cross-correlation analysis and baseline-corrected Tau statistics were used to evaluate the temporal and directional relationships between biomechanical and clinical changes.

📊 Results

🏋️‍♀️ All participants demonstrated changes in lifting technique, though direction and magnitude varied. The most common pattern of improvement was a transition from squat-like to semi-squat or stoop-like lifting. This was characterized by:

▶️ Increased trunk range of motion (ROM) and velocity

▶️ Decreased knee ROM and velocity

▶️ Faster lift duration

✅ Statistically significant relationships were found in:

▶️72% (18/25) of lifting kinematics–functional limitation associations

▶️ 52% (13/25) of lifting kinematics–pain associations

▶️ Temporal analysis revealed that 67% of significant associations occurred with a lag of 0, indicating contemporaneous changes.

💡 Discussion

This study questions the universal application of squat-like lifting advice. Contrary to prevailing belief, transitioning toward more stoop-like techniques—often deemed “unsafe”—was frequently associated with clinical improvement. These findings support CFT’s emphasis on unguarded, relaxed movement strategies and individualized rehabilitation (O’Sullivan et al., 2018; Caneiro et al., 2019). The findings align with earlier single-case and longitudinal studies (Wernli et al., 2020; Chang et al., 2024) that also identified increased trunk motion as beneficial in CLBP. Importantly, these benefits were observed despite participants having unique baseline movement patterns and intervention targets.

Furthermore, improvements noted during the baseline phase suggest that even unguided repeated exposure to lifting may have therapeutic effects, aligning with principles of graded exposure (Vlaeyen et al., 2001).

📌 Conclusions

In people with lifting-related CLBP, changes in lifting technique were frequently associated with reductions in functional limitation and, to a lesser extent, pain. Improvements typically occurred during transitions from squat-like to more stoop-like techniques, characterized by greater trunk motion and velocity. These findings challenge traditional ergonomic recommendations and underscore the importance of individualized, multidimensional care approaches.

📒 References

Beurskens, A. J., et al. (1999). A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 22(3), 144–148.

Borckardt, J. J., & Nash, M. R. (2014). Simulation modelling analysis for small sets of single-subject data. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(3-4), 492–506.

Caneiro, J. P., et al. (2018). Evaluation of implicit associations between back posture and safety of bending and lifting. Scand J Pain, 18(4), 719–728.

Caneiro, J. P., et al. (2019). How does change unfold? A replicated single-case study. Behav Res Ther, 117, 28–39.

Chang, R., et al. (2024). Improvements in forward bending are related to improvements in pain and disability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 54(12), 721–731.

Christe, G., et al. (2024). Changes in spinal motor behaviour are associated with reduced disability. Eur J Pain, 28(6), 1116–1126.

Kent, P., et al. (2023). Cognitive Functional Therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback. Lancet, 401(10392), 1866–1877.

Martimo, K.-P., et al. (2008). Effect of training and lifting equipment for preventing back pain. BMJ, 336(7641), 429–431.

Nolan, D., et al. (2018). What lifting postures do physiotherapists consider safe? Musculoskelet Sci Pract, 33, 35–40.

Nolan, D., et al. (2020). Are there differences in lifting technique in people with and without low back pain? Scand J Pain, 20(1), 215–227.

O’Sullivan, P., et al. (2018). Cognitive Functional Therapy: An integrated behavioral approach. Phys Ther, 98(5), 408–423.

Saraceni, N., et al. (2022). Does intra-lumbar flexion differ in manual workers with and without CLBP? Ergonomics, 65(7), 1–17.

Stevens, M. L., et al. (2016). Patients' and physiotherapists' views on low back pain triggers. Spine, 41(3), E218–E224.

Verbeek, J. H., et al. (2012). Proper manual handling techniques to prevent low back pain. Work, 41(Suppl 1), 2299–2301.

Vlaeyen, J. W. S., et al. (2001). Graded exposure in vivo for pain-related fear. Behav Res Ther, 39(2), 151–166.

von Arx, M. C., et al. (2021). Lifting techniques and low back pain: A systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 94(3), 385–407.

Wernli, K., et al. (2020). Do changes in movement relate to changes in pain and disability? Pain, 161(4), 765–773.

Address

SSISA, Boundary Road, Newlands
Cape Town
7700

Opening Hours

Monday 08:00 - 17:30
Tuesday 08:00 - 17:30
Wednesday 08:00 - 17:30
Thursday 08:00 - 17:30
Friday 08:00 - 17:30

Telephone

+27216595684

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Sports Science Physiotherapy Centre posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Sports Science Physiotherapy Centre:

Share