03/12/2026
I wrote this piece recently about the Covenant House, shortly after I shared it we got kicked out and everything destroyed. I can’t help but think it’s related. Skanska (developer and land owner) included in my original lease that I had to work with the Covenant House, not sure what that meant to be honest and I should have clarified. Does anyone know how or if the two are related?
Compassion Without Accountability: What I’ve Witnessed About the Covenant House Corporate Frame and the Cost Paid by Communities
I didn’t create Montrose Live to become a spillover zone for unmanaged trauma, street conflict, and institutional neglect. I created it to be a place of creativity, growth, and community, a place where people could come together and feel inspired. But over time, I’ve had to confront a reality I can no longer ignore.
The young adults coming from Covenant House are not just struggling. They are being left unsupervised, unsupported, and pushed into public spaces to process pain that should never be dumped onto neighborhoods to carry. At Montrose Live, I have watched them gather to smoke, drink, fight, damage property, and in some cases, steal from the very small businesses we are trying to help build. Just recently, shoes were stolen from The Landfill Collective. I chased the boy across the street and yelled for him to take them off so I could return them to their rightful owner. This is not about a single moment. It is a pattern. It is a system. And it has consequences.
It has become harder and harder to invite families, artists, musicians, and community members into the space because the atmosphere feels unstable. People sense the volatility. They don’t know what version of the environment they are walking into. And when we reach out for help, the response is always the same. The police arrive too late and say there is nothing they can do. Covenant House insists the behavior is outside their responsibility once the kids leave the building. Meanwhile, the damage, emotional, financial, and environmental, is absorbed by us. By the small businesses. By the creatives. By the people actually trying to build something positive that may actually solve the root issue the Covenant House is needed in the first place.
What is even more unsettling is how untouchable Covenant House seems to be in these situations. When incidents involve others in the area, action happens. When they involve Covenant House youth, accountability disappears, as if there is an invisible protection field shielded by donor money and institutional status.
At one point, a homeless man even handed me a handwritten contract. It thanked me for “making Montrose Live for the homeless and underprivileged youth,” laid out a schedule of when they would “clean the area,” and declared itself a binding agreement through March 1st. I didn’t sign it. I didn’t agree to it. I looked at it as a mirror, a reflection of a narrative that has been placed onto us without consent. Because the truth is simple. The space wouldn’t need to be cleaned if it wasn’t being trashed in the first place.
Yet corporations continue to write checks. Reports are published. Funders celebrate impact statistics. Charity narratives are polished and repeated, while the reality unfolding outside the doors is erased from the story. What I see is not empowerment. It is abandonment disguised as compassion, a system where Covenant House receives investment and recognition while the burden of that system is offloaded into the surrounding community.
If you are a corporation funding Covenant House, I believe you should be responsible for understanding the outcomes you are investing in, not just the brochure version. Ask why these young adults are left unsupervised for hours at a time. Ask why community spaces are expected to absorb the behavioral fallout. Ask why the organizations receiving millions in funding are rarely the ones cleaning up the mess, socially, structurally, or physically.
This is not a story about problem kids. This is a story about an institutional frame that benefits from their suffering while outsourcing the responsibility for it. I want something better for these young people. I want real trauma support, meaningful structure, mentorship, dignity, and care, not a model where they are left to unravel in public spaces while corporations collect philanthropy credit.
But unless Covenant House, and the companies underwriting its image, are willing to confront the real-world impact of their model, communities like ours will continue to pay the price. And I am no longer willing to stay silent about that cost.