Battles of Ideas: Strategies for a New Mobility Agenda

Battles of Ideas: Strategies  for a New Mobility Agenda Cities, mobility, environment, climate, public space, equity What is a Soft City.
1. First, it is recognizable. It has a clear sense of identity. And jobs.
10.

When you are there you know where you are.
2. It is a place where many things you need in your daily life are within a comfortable and safe walk or bike ride.
3. It is quiet and clean.
4. And safe – for all but above all for women and children.
5. There are people on the streets (eyes on the street, assuring safety and amenity).
6. Traffic is light, unobtrusive and moves slowly – in tempo with the

others sharing the street.
7. It is self-governed – and the people there vote.
8. It offers schools, [education and culture
9. It is diverse, the people there do not look like clones.
11. Active civil society, caring groups and NGOs to speak for and defend vulnerable populations.
12. Open government, open data
13. A Soft City may well be a satellite city in a larger metropolitan region. A city within a city.
14. It is soft on the planet and has a strategy to reduce GHG and other harmful emissions. And when it comes to mobility and public space:
1. The city offers more and better choices.
2. An active policy guaranteeing mobility and access for all who live there.
3. You can live there quite happily without owning a car.
4. But on the other hand, offers a considerable range of other, and mainly shared, modes (carsharing, ridesharing, bike sharing, shared taxis, DRT, and electrical main line transit systems (urban rail, trams, trolleybuses)
5. It is plugged in, smart if you will.
6. It has a strategic parking policy working to reduce the space of the parked car in the city (rendering this valuable public space available for other social and amenity uses)
7. The body of existing experience and knowledge is altogether sufficient and available to those cities that would put it to wok. It is not a knowledge problem.
8. Nor a technology problem (to the contrary)
9. Nor is it a money problem.
10. It is leadership and awareness challenge (the hardest of all).

03/08/2020

* * * * THE WALKING CITY * * * *

Pioneering Danish urbanist and city architect Jan Gehl (JG) talks to RocaGallery.com (RG)) about prioritising cities for people and ease of mobility
- Source; http://www.rocagallery.com/the-walking-city

Jan Gehl is a city architect that has helped transform places like Copenhagen and Melbourne into some of the world’s most liveable cities and written seminal books such as Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space (1972) and Cities for People (2011) that explore the need for making people-oriented cities.
RG:

(RG) You have written at length about how modernism wasn’t about making cities for people but cities that looked good from above. Can you elaborate?

(JG). Until modernism, cities were built around spaces where people moved around and held markets, which were also spaces that linked various parts of the city together. If you think of the older cities you know, people often don’t remember buildings but the main squares or the important public spaces.

What happened with the modernists was that the focus was completely shifted away from spaces to objects, to buildings. So instead of making spaces with buildings around them, they started to make buildings with no man’s land around them, what I call leftover space. That was a massive change in the way cities were built. The new spaces were often too big, too wide, too windswept and not attractive in any way.

(RG) As a city architect, you have written a lot about the need to study people and how they behave. Many cities have traffic departments but still don’t invest the same sort of money and expertise in studying people. Is that something that you think has changed?

(JG) Oh yes. Motorcars have been a major focus historically because they create accidents. And because there is a lot of money involved in the motorcar industry. But increasingly it has been recognised that if you document something you care about it more. When you know something about how your city is used by its citizens, then that becomes part of what you look at when making policy.

(RG) What are some interesting examples of places that have become better for people in terms of walking and experiencing the city? Of course one of the cities that has been on this bandwagon for the longest time is . . . .. .. ..

* Interview text and images continue here - http://www.rocagallery.com/the-walking-city

JG: CLOSING WORDS:
"But in the end it all comes down to mindset. We have to change the mindset of planners, city architects, and engineers so that instead of going for technocratic, ‘smart’ and technical solutions, they take the well-being of people as their point of departure."

Image: Portrait of Jane Gehl by Sandra Henningsson. © Gehl Architects

05/09/2019

ICELAND STEPS UP

If you are here, it is very possible that you will find value in an open collaborative pioneering climate/mobility project you can visit and perhaps join at

https://www.facebook.com/ClimateActionPlan-Creating-a-New-Mobility-Ecosystem-for-Reykjavik-2020-102044774511708/?modal=admin_todo_tour

1 Sept. 2019. Page just getting underway. in support of Climate.Space.Time.NewMobility.org 2020 Five Percent Challenge. Intended for international readers and collaborators.

(More to follow here.)

09/07/2019

It's simply too costly to make public transport free during spikes in pollution, says the president of the Paris region.

MOST CITIES WILL HAVE TO INTRODUCE CONGESTION CHARGING, Say Experts At Global Transit Conference“There’s an inevitabilit...
11/06/2019

MOST CITIES WILL HAVE TO INTRODUCE CONGESTION CHARGING, Say Experts At Global Transit Conference

“There’s an inevitability about [congestion charging],” the Commissioner of Transport for London told me on a metro ride on June 10. Mike Brown added that “it’ll come” even to those cities run by politicians who fear they would be slung out on their ears for even broaching such an idea.

“It wasn’t popular in London beforehand, either,” he pointed out. London introduced its congestion charge 16 years ago, with much of the resulting revenue spent on improving transit services.

Sweden’s capital Stockholm followed suit in 2007, and it was on Stockholm’s metro that I talked with Brown.

We–along with 15,000 others–were attending the UITP Global Public Transport Summit, organized every two years by the Union Internationale des Transports Publics (UITP).

Source/Continues: Carlton Reid https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2019/06/10/most-cities-will-have-to-introduce-congestion-charging-say-experts-at-global-transit-conference/amp/ . .

Helping to open the UITP Global Public Transport Summit on June 9, Stockholm’s Regional Minister for Transport Kristoffer Tamsons said that “public transport today has become much of the driving force for growth and progress in our society.”

Tamsons, who is also Chairman of Stockholm Public Transport, added that transit was the “backbone” of a city. On June 10 he told journalists that congestion pricing was the surest way for cities to stiffen this backbone and that Stockholm’s experience was that any antipathy towards introducing congestion charging evaporates once the many benefits become apparent, including less traffic, cleaner air, and more cycling.

According to experts gathered at the UITP Global Public Transport Summit in Stockholm most cities will have to embrace congestion charging, if they want their citizens to keep moving. Investment has to be made in public transit and cycling, delegates to the conference were told.

Adresse

Lyon
69003

Notifications

Soyez le premier à savoir et laissez-nous vous envoyer un courriel lorsque Battles of Ideas: Strategies for a New Mobility Agenda publie des nouvelles et des promotions. Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas utilisée à d'autres fins, et vous pouvez vous désabonner à tout moment.

Partager

What is a Safe City

What is a Safe City. 1. First, it is recognizable. It has a clear sense of identity. When you are there you know where you are. 2. It is a place where many things you need in your daily life are within a comfortable and safe walk or bike ride. 3. It is quiet and clean. 4. And safe – for all but above all for women and children. 5. There are people on the streets (eyes on the street, assuring safety and amenity). 6. Traffic is light, unobtrusive and moves slowly – in tempo with the others sharing the street. 7. It is self-governed – and the people there vote. 8. It offers schools, [education and culture 9. And jobs. 10. It is diverse, the people there do not look like clones. 11. Active civil society, caring groups and NGOs to speak for and defend vulnerable populations. 12. Open government, open data 13. A Soft City may well be a satellite city in a larger metropolitan region. A city within a city. 14. It is soft on the planet and has a strategy to reduce GHG and other harmful emissions. And when it comes to mobility and public space: 1. The city offers more and better choices. 2. An active policy guaranteeing mobility and access for all who live there. 3. You can live there quite happily without owning a car. 4. But on the other hand, offers a considerable range of other, and mainly shared, modes (carsharing, ridesharing, bike sharing, shared taxis, DRT, and electrical main line transit systems (urban rail, trams, trolleybuses) 5. It is plugged in, smart if you will. 6. It has a strategic parking policy working to reduce the space of the parked car in the city (rendering this valuable public space available for other social and amenity uses) 7. The body of existing experience and knowledge is altogether sufficient and available to those cities that would put it to wok. It is not a knowledge problem. 8. Nor a technology problem (to the contrary) 9. Nor is it a money problem. 10. It is a huge leadership and awareness challenge (the hardest of all).