Back the Blue Greenville NC

Back the Blue Greenville NC This group exists because Facebook conversations and back room commentary are not enough. Stand with us! I am a concerned Pitt County, NC citizen.

Join us as we rally together and show our appreciation for our law-enforcement officers. This purpose of this page is to educate people in Pitt County about issues related to law enforcement in the Pitt County area. This page was originally started to help promote a law enforcement appreciation event in downtown Greenville, NC. After the event, I have used the page to recognize successes by local

law enforcement and share information related to criminal activities, crime prevention and other issues that affect the citizens of Pitt County. This page is moderated and run solely by myself. All opinions expressed by this page are solely my own. In spite of what some people may say, I am a registered Unaffiliated Voter as such, this page is not affiliated with any political party or candidate.

03/19/2026
03/19/2026
PLAIN IGNORANCE OF THE LAW or ARROGANCE OF POWER? Several documented events suggest a pattern commonly described as the ...
03/13/2026

PLAIN IGNORANCE OF THE LAW or ARROGANCE OF POWER? Several documented events suggest a pattern commonly described as the “arrogance of power”—when a government official behaves as though their authority places them beyond accountability. The following examples outline incidents that have already been reviewed by courts, federal agencies, or publicly discussed in official meetings.



1. Hatch Act Violation

During recent election cycle, Sheriff Dance used county resources in connection with campaign activity.

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel investigated and ruled that Sheriff Dance did violate the Hatch Act, which restricts certain political activities by government officials using public resources. The agency issued a warning rather than a stronger penalty. Is this one really over?



2. First Amendment Concerns – Social Media Censorship

For several years, the Pitt County Sheriff’s Office social media pages selectively censored public comments.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that selective censorship of public comments on government-operated social media pages violates the First Amendment. Despite being informed that the practice was unlawful, the selective censorship continued for an extended period.

Eventually, the Sheriff’s Office disabled public comments entirely because Paula Dance couldn’t selectively silence her critics.



3. Retaliatory No-Contact Order

After I personally delivered a letter to the front desk of the Sheriff’s Office—written by attorneys associated with the ACLU explaining the relevant First Amendment case law—Sheriff Dance filed a No Contact Order against me.

The judge ruled in my favor on all counts and further determined that the case had been filed despite the Sheriff knowing there was no legal basis for the action.

Sheriff Dance was ordered to pay my attorney’s fees as a sanction.

While the ruling was clear, finding legal representation proved difficult. Seven law firms declined to pursue a case against the Sheriff. Two indicated concerns about potential public relations consequences related to pursuing legal action against a Sheriff. Two were specifically concerned about filing suit against “the first Black female sheriff in North Carolina.”



4. Retaliation Case – Deputy Ray Smith

Deputy Ray Smith was terminated after declining to shut down a church service on Easter Sunday.

Following his termination, false information was allegedly placed in his personnel file and forwarded to the North Carolina Training and Standards Commission, the body responsible for law-enforcement credentialing.

Smith filed a lawsuit in federal court and ultimately received a substantial settlement from Pitt County.

This matter was publicly acknowledged during the Pitt County Board of Commissioners meeting on March 3, where the settlement was discussed.



5. Procurement and Contract Concerns

In her resignation letter, former Sheriff’s Office Business Manager Molly Plount stated that the Sheriff’s Office allowed a vendor to operate vending services in the Pitt County Detention Center without a formal contract and without public bidding.

Similar situations have prompted State Bureau of Investigation inquiries in other North Carolina counties.

In this case, the county’s response was to obtain a signed contract and a letter from the vendor stating that no illegal kickbacks had occurred. However, the contract was not placed out for public bid, and no independent investigation was conducted. Again Paula Dance dodged accountability.

Some research studies (Harvard Business School) strongly suggest that ethics is not teachable after the mid to late teen...
03/09/2026

Some research studies (Harvard Business School) strongly suggest that ethics is not teachable after the mid to late teens. That means the ethics you were exposed to as a child will be used for the rest of your life. With lying, you may be smart enough to follow society's rules to stay out of trouble most of the time, but you probably will have no qualms about adjusting your behaviors to your needs if the occasion arises. This is especially true if you see this behavior in your superior's actions.

Now that you know this information, it becomes increasingly crucial for you, as a parent, to show your children what ethical behaviors are and what they can do for them. It's equally essential for you as a manager, leader, or boss to demonstrate behavior that is above reproach and that you expect others to treat you in the same manner.

In a recent Wall Street Journal article, the author noted that lying no longer seems confined to the top echelon of business and is rapidly spreading throughout businesses. They considered 'cooking the corporate books' to be in the same category as 'calling in sick' when someone wasn't sick.

Your Pastor & Politics, The Shepherd Leading The Flock Astray BEWARE OF FALSE PROFITSEXAMPLE: Darron Carmon https://www....
03/06/2026

Your Pastor & Politics, The Shepherd Leading The Flock Astray
BEWARE OF FALSE PROFITS
EXAMPLE: Darron Carmon https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CFcYFepyR/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Throughout history, people have looked to pastors and preachers for moral guidance, spiritual leadership, and truth rooted in scripture. Congregations trust that the person behind the pulpit will help them navigate right from wrong using biblical principles rather than personal agendas.

But when religion becomes a tool for political promotion, that sacred trust can quickly erode.

Increasingly, some preachers are using their pulpits to openly support political candidates—sometimes even candidates whose conduct appears to conflict with the very biblical principles those preachers claim to uphold. When this happens, it raises serious questions about integrity, honesty, and the proper role of the church.

Misleading the Congregation

A congregation expects its spiritual leaders to present truth, wisdom, and discernment—not political messaging disguised as divine guidance.

When a preacher promotes a political candidate from the pulpit, many members of the congregation naturally assume that endorsement carries spiritual legitimacy. After all, if their pastor supports someone, it must mean that person represents the values of the faith… right?

Not necessarily.

The reality is that many churchgoers may never hear the full story about a candidate’s behavior, leadership record, or controversies. Instead, they may hear a simplified narrative crafted to support a preferred political outcome.

That is not spiritual guidance.
That is persuasion.

And when persuasion is wrapped in scripture, it can easily mislead people who trust their spiritual leaders to speak truthfully.

The Hypocrisy Problem

The Bible is full of warnings about hypocrisy.

Jesus himself repeatedly rebuked religious leaders who publicly proclaimed righteousness while privately ignoring the very standards they taught others to follow.

Supporting political figures whose actions contradict biblical teachings raises a difficult question:

Are these endorsements about faith—or about power?

If a preacher condemns dishonesty, arrogance, mistreatment of others, or abuse of authority from the pulpit on Sunday—but then supports a political figure accused of those same behaviors on Monday—the contradiction becomes impossible to ignore.

Faith demands consistency.
Leadership demands accountability.

Without those, the message loses credibility.

When Religion Becomes a Political Tool

Churches are meant to be places of worship, reflection, and spiritual growth—not campaign headquarters.

Using religion as a vehicle to advance political agendas undermines both faith and democracy. The pulpit should not become a platform for partisan messaging, and spiritual authority should not be used to pressure congregants into supporting specific candidates.

In fact, U.S. tax law recognizes this concern. Churches that receive tax-exempt status are expected to avoid direct participation or intervention in political campaigns. When clergy openly endorse candidates, they risk crossing a line that exists to preserve the separation between religious influence and political power.

But beyond legal questions lies a deeper issue: moral responsibility.

When faith leaders prioritize political loyalty over spiritual integrity, they risk turning the church into something it was never meant to be—a tool for influence rather than a place for truth.

A Warning as Old as Scripture

The Bible repeatedly cautions believers about false teachers and leaders who misuse faith for personal or worldly gain.

In Matthew 7:15, Jesus warned:

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.”

That warning still matters today.

People of faith should always evaluate what they hear—even from those behind the pulpit. Spiritual authority should never replace personal discernment, and no political figure should receive unquestioned support simply because a preacher says so.

Faith is strongest when it stands on truth, humility, and accountability—not when it is used as a vehicle for political ambition.

Because when the line between ministry and political campaigning disappears, the result is exactly what scripture warned about long ago.

Address

Greenville, NC

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Back the Blue Greenville NC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share